CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X103 vs H-600x300x12x20-151

W 24X103 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-600x300x12x20-151 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 24X103 carries more bending: 4588.4 cm³ of plastic modulus against 4489 cm³, 2.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 153.3 kg/m and 151 kg/m. W 24X103 is deeper, 622.3 mm against 588 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X103
W
H-600x300x12x20-151
MB & MC
Difference
Mass153.3 kg/m151 kg/m+1.5%
Depth622.3 mm588 mm+5.8%
Width228.6 mm300 mm-23.8%
Web thickness14 mm12 mm+16.7%
Flange thickness24.9 mm20 mm+24.5%
Area195.5 cm²192 cm²+1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)124,869 cm⁴118,100 cm⁴+5.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,588.4 cm³4,489 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,014.8 cm³4,018 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,953 cm⁴9,025 cm⁴-45.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)680.06 cm³928 cm³-26.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.05 cm6.85 cm-26.3%
Torsion constant (It)294.3 cm⁴241 cm⁴+22.1%

W 24X103 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-600x300x12x20-151 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x300x12x20-151.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X103 has the larger second moment of area: 124,869 cm⁴ against 118,100 cm⁴, a difference of 5.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (29.9 against 29.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-600x300x12x20-151 has 928 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 680.06 cm³, 26.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 24X103 is the stronger section and H-600x300x12x20-151 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X103 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 4588.4 cm³ against 4489 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X103 is 153.3 kg/m and H-600x300x12x20-151 is 151 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x300x12x20-151 gives 4489 cm³ of plastic modulus and 118,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 4588.4 cm³ and 124,869 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X103, with a second moment of area of 124,869 cm⁴ against 118,100 cm⁴ (5.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×149 vs W 24X103UB 610×305×149 vs H-600x300x12x20-151W 24X103 vs IPE O 600W 24X103 vs S 24X106
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…