CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×305×149 vs H-600x300x12x20-151

UB 610×305×149 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-600x300x12x20-151 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UB 610×305×149 carries more bending: 4590 cm³ of plastic modulus against 4489 cm³, 2.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 149.2 kg/m and 151 kg/m. UB 610×305×149 is deeper, 612.4 mm against 588 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×305×149
UB
H-600x300x12x20-151
MB & MC
Difference
Mass149.2 kg/m151 kg/m-1.2%
Depth612.4 mm588 mm+4.1%
Width304.8 mm300 mm+1.6%
Web thickness11.8 mm12 mm-1.7%
Flange thickness19.7 mm20 mm-1.5%
Area190 cm²192 cm²-1.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)126,000 cm⁴118,100 cm⁴+6.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,590 cm³4,489 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,110 cm³4,018 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,310 cm⁴9,025 cm⁴+3.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)937 cm³928 cm³+1.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7 cm6.85 cm+2.2%
Torsion constant (It)200 cm⁴241 cm⁴-17.0%

UB 610×305×149 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-600x300x12x20-151 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x300x12x20-151.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 610×305×149 has the larger second moment of area: 126,000 cm⁴ against 118,100 cm⁴, a difference of 6.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 610×305×149 is the more efficient section: 30.8 against 29.7 cm³ per kg/m, 3.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, UB 610×305×149 is the stronger section and UB 610×305×149 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 610×305×149 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 4590 cm³ against 4489 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×305×149 is 149.2 kg/m and H-600x300x12x20-151 is 151 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x300x12x20-151 gives 4489 cm³ of plastic modulus and 118,100 cm⁴ of inertia against 4590 cm³ and 126,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 610×305×149, with a second moment of area of 126,000 cm⁴ against 118,100 cm⁴ (6.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×149 vs IPE O 600UB 610×305×149 vs W 24X103UB 610×305×149 vs S 24X106W 24X104 vs UB 610×305×149W 24X103 vs H-600x300x12x20-151
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…