CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×305×149 vs W 24X103

UB 610×305×149 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X103 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4590 cm³ against 4588.4 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. UB 610×305×149 is the lighter of the two at 149.2 kg/m against 153.3 kg/m, a saving of 2.7% on steel weight. Both are about 617 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×305×149
UB
W 24X103
W
Difference
Mass149.2 kg/m153.3 kg/m-2.7%
Depth612.4 mm622.3 mm-1.6%
Width304.8 mm228.6 mm+33.3%
Web thickness11.8 mm14 mm-15.7%
Flange thickness19.7 mm24.9 mm-20.9%
Area190 cm²195.5 cm²-2.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)126,000 cm⁴124,869 cm⁴+0.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,590 cm³4,588.4 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,110 cm³4,014.8 cm³+2.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,310 cm⁴4,953 cm⁴+88.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)937 cm³680.06 cm³+37.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7 cm5.05 cm+38.6%
Torsion constant (It)200 cm⁴294.3 cm⁴-32.0%

UB 610×305×149 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X103 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X103.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 610×305×149 has the larger second moment of area: 126,000 cm⁴ against 124,869 cm⁴, a difference of 0.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 610×305×149 is the more efficient section: 30.8 against 29.9 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 610×305×149 has 937 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 680.06 cm³, 37.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.7% weight.

In short, UB 610×305×149 is the stronger section and UB 610×305×149 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×305×149 has a plastic modulus of 4590 cm³ and W 24X103 has 4588.4 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 610×305×149 at 149.2 kg/m, against 153.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X103 gives 4588.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 124,869 cm⁴ of inertia against 4590 cm³ and 126,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 610×305×149, with a second moment of area of 126,000 cm⁴ against 124,869 cm⁴ (0.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×305×149 vs IPE O 600UB 610×305×149 vs S 24X106UB 610×305×149 vs H-600x300x12x20-151W 24X104 vs UB 610×305×149W 24X103 vs IPE O 600W 24X103 vs S 24X106W 24X103 vs H-600x300x12x20-151
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…