CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X62 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5

W 24X62 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-600x200x10x15-92.5 carries more bending: 2576 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2507.2 cm³, 2.7% more. They weigh essentially the same, 92.3 kg/m and 92.5 kg/m. Both are about 599 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X62
W
H-600x200x10x15-92.5
MB & MC
Difference
Mass92.3 kg/m92.5 kg/m-0.2%
Depth602 mm596 mm+1.0%
Width178.8 mm199 mm-10.2%
Web thickness10.9 mm10 mm+9.0%
Flange thickness15 mm15 mmsame
Area117.4 cm²118 cm²-0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)64,516 cm⁴66,640 cm⁴-3.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,507.2 cm³2,576 cm³-2.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,146.7 cm³2,236 cm³-4.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,436 cm⁴1,976 cm⁴-27.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)257.28 cm³312 cm³-17.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.51 cm4.1 cm-14.4%
Torsion constant (It)71.18 cm⁴69.2 cm⁴+2.9%

W 24X62 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-600x200x10x15-92.5 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x200x10x15-92.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 has the larger second moment of area: 66,640 cm⁴ against 64,516 cm⁴, a difference of 3.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the more efficient section: 27.8 against 27.2 cm³ per kg/m, 2.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-600x200x10x15-92.5 has 312 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 257.28 cm³, 17.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the stronger section and W 24X62 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2576 cm³ against 2507.2 cm³ - 2.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X62 is 92.3 kg/m and H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is 92.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x200x10x15-92.5 gives 2576 cm³ of plastic modulus and 66,640 cm⁴ of inertia against 2507.2 cm³ and 64,516 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-600x200x10x15-92.5, with a second moment of area of 66,640 cm⁴ against 64,516 cm⁴ (3.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×178×92 vs W 24X62UB 610×178×92 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…