CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×178×92 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5

UB 610×178×92 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-600x200x10x15-92.5 carries more bending: 2576 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2510 cm³, 2.6% more. They weigh essentially the same, 92.2 kg/m and 92.5 kg/m. Both are about 600 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×178×92
UB
H-600x200x10x15-92.5
MB & MC
Difference
Mass92.2 kg/m92.5 kg/m-0.3%
Depth603 mm596 mm+1.2%
Width178.8 mm199 mm-10.2%
Web thickness10.9 mm10 mm+9.0%
Flange thickness15 mm15 mmsame
Area117 cm²118 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)64,600 cm⁴66,640 cm⁴-3.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,510 cm³2,576 cm³-2.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,140 cm³2,236 cm³-4.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,440 cm⁴1,976 cm⁴-27.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)258 cm³312 cm³-17.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.5 cm4.1 cm-14.6%
Torsion constant (It)71 cm⁴69.2 cm⁴+2.6%

UB 610×178×92 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-600x200x10x15-92.5 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x200x10x15-92.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 has the larger second moment of area: 66,640 cm⁴ against 64,600 cm⁴, a difference of 3.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the more efficient section: 27.8 against 27.2 cm³ per kg/m, 2.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-600x200x10x15-92.5 has 312 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 258 cm³, 17.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the stronger section and UB 610×178×92 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2576 cm³ against 2510 cm³ - 2.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×178×92 is 92.2 kg/m and H-600x200x10x15-92.5 is 92.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x200x10x15-92.5 gives 2576 cm³ of plastic modulus and 66,640 cm⁴ of inertia against 2510 cm³ and 64,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-600x200x10x15-92.5, with a second moment of area of 66,640 cm⁴ against 64,600 cm⁴ (3.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×178×92 vs W 24X62W 24X62 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…