CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×178×92 vs W 24X62

UB 610×178×92 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X62 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2510 cm³ against 2507.2 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 92.2 kg/m and 92.3 kg/m. Both are about 603 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×178×92
UB
W 24X62
W
Difference
Mass92.2 kg/m92.3 kg/m-0.1%
Depth603 mm602 mm+0.2%
Width178.8 mm178.8 mmsame
Web thickness10.9 mm10.9 mmsame
Flange thickness15 mm15 mmsame
Area117 cm²117.4 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)64,600 cm⁴64,516 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,510 cm³2,507.2 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,140 cm³2,146.7 cm³-0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,440 cm⁴1,436 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)258 cm³257.28 cm³+0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.5 cm3.51 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)71 cm⁴71.18 cm⁴-0.3%

UB 610×178×92 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X62 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X62.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 610×178×92 has the larger second moment of area: 64,600 cm⁴ against 64,516 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (27.2 against 27.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×178×92 has a plastic modulus of 2510 cm³ and W 24X62 has 2507.2 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×178×92 is 92.2 kg/m and W 24X62 is 92.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X62 gives 2507.2 cm³ of plastic modulus and 64,516 cm⁴ of inertia against 2510 cm³ and 64,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 610×178×92, with a second moment of area of 64,600 cm⁴ against 64,516 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×178×92 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5W 24X62 vs H-600x200x10x15-92.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…