CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X68 vs H-600x200x11x17-103

W 24X68 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-600x200x11x17-103 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2900.5 cm³ against 2904 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 101.2 kg/m and 103 kg/m. Both are about 601 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X68
W
H-600x200x11x17-103
MB & MC
Difference
Mass101.2 kg/m103 kg/m-1.7%
Depth602 mm600 mm+0.3%
Width227.8 mm200 mm+13.9%
Web thickness10.5 mm11 mm-4.5%
Flange thickness14.9 mm17 mm-12.4%
Area129.7 cm²132 cm²-1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)76,170 cm⁴75,560 cm⁴+0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,900.5 cm³2,904 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,523.6 cm³2,519 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,930 cm⁴2,274 cm⁴+28.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)401.48 cm³358 cm³+12.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.75 cm4.16 cm+14.2%
Torsion constant (It)77.84 cm⁴97.3 cm⁴-20.0%

W 24X68 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-600x200x11x17-103 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-600x200x11x17-103.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X68 has the larger second moment of area: 76,170 cm⁴ against 75,560 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (28.7 against 28.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 24X68 has 401.48 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 358 cm³, 12.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 24X68 has a plastic modulus of 2900.5 cm³ and H-600x200x11x17-103 has 2904 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X68 is 101.2 kg/m and H-600x200x11x17-103 is 103 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-600x200x11x17-103 gives 2904 cm³ of plastic modulus and 75,560 cm⁴ of inertia against 2900.5 cm³ and 76,170 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X68, with a second moment of area of 76,170 cm⁴ against 75,560 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×101 vs W 24X68UB 610×229×101 vs H-600x200x11x17-103UB 610×178×100 vs W 24X68UB 610×178×100 vs H-600x200x11x17-103
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…