CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×229×101 vs W 24X68

UB 610×229×101 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X68 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2880 cm³ against 2900.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. They weigh essentially the same, 101.2 kg/m and 101.2 kg/m. Both are about 602 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×229×101
UB
W 24X68
W
Difference
Mass101.2 kg/m101.2 kg/msame
Depth602.6 mm602 mm+0.1%
Width227.6 mm227.8 mm-0.1%
Web thickness10.5 mm10.5 mmsame
Flange thickness14.8 mm14.9 mm-0.7%
Area129 cm²129.7 cm²-0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)75,800 cm⁴76,170 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,880 cm³2,900.5 cm³-0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,520 cm³2,523.6 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,910 cm⁴2,930 cm⁴-0.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)400 cm³401.48 cm³-0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.75 cm4.75 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)77 cm⁴77.84 cm⁴-1.1%

UB 610×229×101 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X68 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X68.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X68 has the larger second moment of area: 76,170 cm⁴ against 75,800 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (28.5 against 28.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×229×101 has a plastic modulus of 2880 cm³ and W 24X68 has 2900.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×229×101 is 101.2 kg/m and W 24X68 is 101.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X68 gives 2900.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 76,170 cm⁴ of inertia against 2880 cm³ and 75,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X68, with a second moment of area of 76,170 cm⁴ against 75,800 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×101 vs H-600x200x11x17-103UB 610×178×100 vs W 24X68W 24X68 vs H-600x200x11x17-103
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…