CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×178×100 vs W 24X68

UB 610×178×100 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X68 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 24X68 carries more bending: 2900.5 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2790 cm³, 3.8% more. They weigh essentially the same, 100.3 kg/m and 101.2 kg/m. Both are about 605 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×178×100
UB
W 24X68
W
Difference
Mass100.3 kg/m101.2 kg/m-0.9%
Depth607.4 mm602 mm+0.9%
Width179.2 mm227.8 mm-21.3%
Web thickness11.3 mm10.5 mm+7.6%
Flange thickness17.2 mm14.9 mm+15.4%
Area128 cm²129.7 cm²-1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)72,500 cm⁴76,170 cm⁴-4.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,790 cm³2,900.5 cm³-3.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,390 cm³2,523.6 cm³-5.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,660 cm⁴2,930 cm⁴-43.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)296 cm³401.48 cm³-26.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.6 cm4.75 cm-24.2%
Torsion constant (It)95 cm⁴77.84 cm⁴+22.0%

UB 610×178×100 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X68 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X68.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X68 has the larger second moment of area: 76,170 cm⁴ against 72,500 cm⁴, a difference of 4.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X68 is the more efficient section: 28.7 against 27.8 cm³ per kg/m, 2.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 24X68 has 401.48 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 296 cm³, 26.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 24X68 is the stronger section and UB 610×178×100 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X68 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2900.5 cm³ against 2790 cm³ - 3.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×178×100 is 100.3 kg/m and W 24X68 is 101.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X68 gives 2900.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 76,170 cm⁴ of inertia against 2790 cm³ and 72,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X68, with a second moment of area of 76,170 cm⁴ against 72,500 cm⁴ (4.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×101 vs W 24X68UB 610×178×100 vs IPE 550UB 610×178×100 vs H-600x200x11x17-103W 24X68 vs H-600x200x11x17-103
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…