CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X94 vs HE 650 AA

W 24X94 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 650 AA is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4162.3 cm³ against 4160 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 139.9 kg/m and 138 kg/m. Both are about 619 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X94
W
HE 650 AA
HE
Difference
Mass139.9 kg/m138 kg/m+1.4%
Depth617.2 mm620 mm-0.5%
Width230.4 mm300 mm-23.2%
Web thickness13.1 mm12.5 mm+4.8%
Flange thickness22.2 mm16 mm+38.7%
Area178.7 cm²176 cm²+1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)112,382 cm⁴114,000 cm⁴-1.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,162.3 cm³4,160 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,637.9 cm³3,680 cm³-1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,537 cm⁴7,220 cm⁴-37.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)614.51 cm³751 cm³-18.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.03 cm6.41 cm-21.5%
Torsion constant (It)218.9 cm⁴158 cm⁴+38.5%

W 24X94 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 650 AA to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 650 AA.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 650 AA has the larger second moment of area: 114,000 cm⁴ against 112,382 cm⁴, a difference of 1.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (29.8 against 30.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 650 AA has 751 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 614.51 cm³, 18.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 24X94 has a plastic modulus of 4162.3 cm³ and HE 650 AA has 4160 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X94 is 139.9 kg/m and HE 650 AA is 138 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 650 AA gives 4160 cm³ of plastic modulus and 114,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 4162.3 cm³ and 112,382 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 650 AA, with a second moment of area of 114,000 cm⁴ against 112,382 cm⁴ (1.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×229×140 vs HE 650 AAUB 610×229×140 vs W 24X94
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…