CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 30X116 vs IPE 750 x 173

W 30X116 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE 750 x 173 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6194.3 cm³ against 6220 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 172.6 kg/m and 173 kg/m. Both are about 762 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 30X116
W
IPE 750 x 173
IPE
Difference
Mass172.6 kg/m173 kg/m-0.2%
Depth762 mm762 mmsame
Width266.7 mm267 mm-0.1%
Web thickness14.4 mm14.4 mmsame
Flange thickness21.6 mm21.6 mmsame
Area220.6 cm²221 cm²-0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)205,202 cm⁴206,000 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,194.3 cm³6,220 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,391.3 cm³5,400 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)6,826 cm⁴6,870 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)806.24 cm³810 cm³-0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.56 cm5.57 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)267.6 cm⁴270 cm⁴-0.9%

W 30X116 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE 750 x 173 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 750 x 173.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 750 x 173 has the larger second moment of area: 206,000 cm⁴ against 205,202 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (35.9 against 36.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 30X116 has a plastic modulus of 6194.3 cm³ and IPE 750 x 173 has 6220 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 30X116 is 172.6 kg/m and IPE 750 x 173 is 173 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 750 x 173 gives 6220 cm³ of plastic modulus and 206,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 6194.3 cm³ and 205,202 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 750 x 173, with a second moment of area of 206,000 cm⁴ against 205,202 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×173 vs IPE 750 x 173UB 762×267×173 vs W 30X116W 30X116 vs HE 800 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…