CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 762×267×173 vs W 30X116

UB 762×267×173 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 30X116 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6200 cm³ against 6194.3 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 173 kg/m and 172.6 kg/m. Both are about 762 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 762×267×173
UB
W 30X116
W
Difference
Mass173 kg/m172.6 kg/m+0.2%
Depth762.2 mm762 mmsame
Width266.7 mm266.7 mmsame
Web thickness14.3 mm14.4 mm-0.7%
Flange thickness21.6 mm21.6 mmsame
Area220 cm²220.6 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)205,000 cm⁴205,202 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,200 cm³6,194.3 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,390 cm³5,391.3 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)6,850 cm⁴6,826 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)807 cm³806.24 cm³+0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.58 cm5.56 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)267 cm⁴267.6 cm⁴-0.2%

UB 762×267×173 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 30X116 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 30X116.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 30X116 has the larger second moment of area: 205,202 cm⁴ against 205,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (35.8 against 35.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 762×267×173 has a plastic modulus of 6200 cm³ and W 30X116 has 6194.3 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 762×267×173 is 173 kg/m and W 30X116 is 172.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 30X116 gives 6194.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 205,202 cm⁴ of inertia against 6200 cm³ and 205,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 30X116, with a second moment of area of 205,202 cm⁴ against 205,000 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×173 vs IPE 750 x 173UB 762×267×173 vs HE 800 AAW 30X116 vs IPE 750 x 173W 30X116 vs HE 800 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…