CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 30X90 vs IPE 750 x 134

W 30X90 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; IPE 750 x 134 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4637.5 cm³ against 4640 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 133.9 kg/m and 134 kg/m. Both are about 750 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 30X90
W
IPE 750 x 134
IPE
Difference
Mass133.9 kg/m134 kg/m-0.1%
Depth749.3 mm750 mm-0.1%
Width264.2 mm264 mm+0.1%
Web thickness11.9 mm12 mm-0.8%
Flange thickness15.5 mm15.5 mmsame
Area169.7 cm²171 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)150,260 cm⁴151,000 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,637.5 cm³4,640 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,014.8 cm³4,020 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,787 cm⁴4,790 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)568.63 cm³570 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.31 cm5.3 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)118.2 cm⁴120 cm⁴-1.5%

W 30X90 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; IPE 750 x 134 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 750 x 134.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 750 x 134 has the larger second moment of area: 151,000 cm⁴ against 150,260 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (34.6 against 34.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 30X90 has a plastic modulus of 4637.5 cm³ and IPE 750 x 134 has 4640 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 30X90 is 133.9 kg/m and IPE 750 x 134 is 134 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 750 x 134 gives 4640 cm³ of plastic modulus and 151,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 4637.5 cm³ and 150,260 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 750 x 134, with a second moment of area of 151,000 cm⁴ against 150,260 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×134 vs IPE 750 x 134UB 762×267×134 vs W 30X90
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…