CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 762×267×134 vs IPE 750 x 134

UB 762×267×134 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE 750 x 134 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4640 cm³ against 4640 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 133.9 kg/m and 134 kg/m. Both are about 750 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 762×267×134
UB
IPE 750 x 134
IPE
Difference
Mass133.9 kg/m134 kg/m-0.1%
Depth750 mm750 mmsame
Width264.4 mm264 mm+0.2%
Web thickness12 mm12 mmsame
Flange thickness15.5 mm15.5 mmsame
Area171 cm²171 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)151,000 cm⁴151,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,640 cm³4,640 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,020 cm³4,020 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,790 cm⁴4,790 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)570 cm³570 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.3 cm5.3 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)119 cm⁴120 cm⁴-0.8%

UB 762×267×134 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE 750 x 134 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 750 x 134.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 750 x 134 has the larger second moment of area: 151,000 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (34.7 against 34.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 762×267×134 has a plastic modulus of 4640 cm³ and IPE 750 x 134 has 4640 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 762×267×134 is 133.9 kg/m and IPE 750 x 134 is 134 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 750 x 134 gives 4640 cm³ of plastic modulus and 151,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 4640 cm³ and 151,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 750 x 134, with a second moment of area of 151,000 cm⁴ against 151,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×134 vs W 30X90W 30X90 vs IPE 750 x 134
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…