CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 762×267×134 vs W 30X90

UB 762×267×134 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 30X90 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4640 cm³ against 4637.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 133.9 kg/m and 133.9 kg/m. Both are about 750 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 762×267×134
UB
W 30X90
W
Difference
Mass133.9 kg/m133.9 kg/msame
Depth750 mm749.3 mm+0.1%
Width264.4 mm264.2 mm+0.1%
Web thickness12 mm11.9 mm+0.8%
Flange thickness15.5 mm15.5 mmsame
Area171 cm²169.7 cm²+0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)151,000 cm⁴150,260 cm⁴+0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,640 cm³4,637.5 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,020 cm³4,014.8 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,790 cm⁴4,787 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)570 cm³568.63 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.3 cm5.31 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)119 cm⁴118.2 cm⁴+0.7%

UB 762×267×134 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 30X90 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 30X90.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 762×267×134 has the larger second moment of area: 151,000 cm⁴ against 150,260 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (34.7 against 34.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 762×267×134 has a plastic modulus of 4640 cm³ and W 30X90 has 4637.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 762×267×134 is 133.9 kg/m and W 30X90 is 133.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 30X90 gives 4637.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 150,260 cm⁴ of inertia against 4640 cm³ and 151,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 762×267×134, with a second moment of area of 151,000 cm⁴ against 150,260 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×134 vs IPE 750 x 134W 30X90 vs IPE 750 x 134
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…