CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X232 vs UB 914×419×343

W 36X232 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 914×419×343 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 15338.3 cm³ against 15500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 345.3 kg/m and 343.3 kg/m. W 36X232 is deeper, 942.3 mm against 911.8 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X232
W
UB 914×419×343
UB
Difference
Mass345.3 kg/m343.3 kg/m+0.6%
Depth942.3 mm911.8 mm+3.3%
Width307.3 mm418.5 mm-26.6%
Web thickness22.1 mm19.4 mm+13.9%
Flange thickness39.9 mm32 mm+24.7%
Area438.7 cm²437 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)624,347 cm⁴626,000 cm⁴-0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)15,338.3 cm³15,500 cm³-1.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)13,257.1 cm³13,700 cm³-3.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)19,480 cm⁴39,200 cm⁴-50.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,999.2 cm³2,890 cm³-30.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.65 cm9.46 cm-29.7%
Torsion constant (It)1,648 cm⁴1,190 cm⁴+38.5%

W 36X232 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 914×419×343 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 914×419×343.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 914×419×343 has the larger second moment of area: 626,000 cm⁴ against 624,347 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (44.4 against 45.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 914×419×343 has 2890 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1999.2 cm³, 30.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X232 has a plastic modulus of 15338.3 cm³ and UB 914×419×343 has 15500 cm³, a difference of only 1.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 36X232 is 345.3 kg/m and UB 914×419×343 is 343.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 914×419×343 gives 15500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 626,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 15338.3 cm³ and 624,347 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 914×419×343, with a second moment of area of 626,000 cm⁴ against 624,347 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×419×343 vs W 36X231W 33X241 vs UB 914×419×343
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…