CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 914×419×343 vs W 36X231

UB 914×419×343 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 36X231 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 15500 cm³ against 15780.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 343.3 kg/m and 343.8 kg/m. Both are about 919 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 914×419×343
UB
W 36X231
W
Difference
Mass343.3 kg/m343.8 kg/m-0.1%
Depth911.8 mm927.1 mm-1.7%
Width418.5 mm419.1 mm-0.1%
Web thickness19.4 mm19.3 mm+0.5%
Flange thickness32 mm32 mmsame
Area437 cm²440 cm²-0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)626,000 cm⁴649,321 cm⁴-3.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)15,500 cm³15,780.7 cm³-1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)13,700 cm³13,994.6 cm³-2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)39,200 cm⁴39,126 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,890 cm³2,884.1 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.46 cm9.42 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)1,190 cm⁴1,195 cm⁴-0.4%

UB 914×419×343 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 36X231 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 36X231.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X231 has the larger second moment of area: 649,321 cm⁴ against 626,000 cm⁴, a difference of 3.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (45.2 against 45.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 914×419×343 has a plastic modulus of 15500 cm³ and W 36X231 has 15780.7 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 914×419×343 is 343.3 kg/m and W 36X231 is 343.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 36X231 gives 15780.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 649,321 cm⁴ of inertia against 15500 cm³ and 626,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X231, with a second moment of area of 649,321 cm⁴ against 626,000 cm⁴ (3.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 36X232 vs UB 914×419×343W 33X241 vs UB 914×419×343
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…