CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 44X290 vs HE 1000 x 494

W 44X290 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 494 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 23105.8 cm³ against 23400 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. W 44X290 is the lighter of the two at 431.6 kg/m against 494 kg/m, a saving of 12.6% on steel weight. W 44X290 is deeper, 1107.4 mm against 1036 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 44X290
W
HE 1000 x 494
HE
Difference
Mass431.6 kg/m494 kg/m-12.6%
Depth1107.4 mm1036 mm+6.9%
Width401.3 mm309 mm+29.9%
Web thickness22 mm31 mm-29.0%
Flange thickness40.1 mm54 mm-25.7%
Area551 cm²629 cm²-12.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,123,825 cm⁴1,028,000 cm⁴+9.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)23,105.8 cm³23,400 cm³-1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)20,320 cm³19,800 cm³+2.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)43,288 cm⁴26,800 cm⁴+61.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,359.3 cm³2,820 cm³+19.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.86 cm6.53 cm+35.7%
Torsion constant (It)2,119 cm⁴4,400 cm⁴-51.8%

W 44X290 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 494 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 494.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 44X290 has the larger second moment of area: 1,123,825 cm⁴ against 1,028,000 cm⁴, a difference of 9.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 44X290 is the more efficient section: 53.5 against 47.4 cm³ per kg/m, 13.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 44X290 has 3359.3 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2820 cm³, 19.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 12.6% weight.

In short, HE 1000 x 494 is the stronger section and W 44X290 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 44X290 has a plastic modulus of 23105.8 cm³ and HE 1000 x 494 has 23400 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 44X290 at 431.6 kg/m, against 494 kg/m for the other - a saving of 12.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 494 gives 23400 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,028,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 23105.8 cm³ and 1,123,825 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 44X290, with a second moment of area of 1,123,825 cm⁴ against 1,028,000 cm⁴ (9.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×487 vs HE 1000 x 494W 44X290 vs UB 1016×305×487W 40X324 vs HE 1000 x 494W 40X331 vs HE 1000 x 494W 40X327 vs HE 1000 x 494W 36X330 vs HE 1000 x 494W 36X350 vs HE 1000 x 494
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…