CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 300 B vs UC 254×254×132

HE 300 B is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; UC 254×254×132 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1870 cm³ against 1870 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. HE 300 B is the lighter of the two at 117 kg/m against 132 kg/m, a saving of 11.4% on steel weight. HE 300 B is deeper, 300 mm against 276.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 300 B
HE
UC 254×254×132
UC
Difference
Mass117 kg/m132 kg/m-11.4%
Depth300 mm276.3 mm+8.6%
Width300 mm261.3 mm+14.8%
Web thickness11 mm15.3 mm-28.1%
Flange thickness19 mm25.3 mm-24.9%
Area149 cm²168 cm²-11.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)25,200 cm⁴22,500 cm⁴+12.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,870 cm³1,870 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,680 cm³1,630 cm³+3.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,560 cm⁴7,530 cm⁴+13.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)870 cm³878 cm³-0.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.58 cm6.69 cm+13.3%
Torsion constant (It)189 cm⁴319 cm⁴-40.8%

HE 300 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UC 254×254×132 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UC 254×254×132.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 300 B has the larger second moment of area: 25,200 cm⁴ against 22,500 cm⁴, a difference of 12.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 300 B is the more efficient section: 16.0 against 14.2 cm³ per kg/m, 12.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UC to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.4% weight.

In short, UC 254×254×132 is the stronger section and HE 300 B is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. HE 300 B has a plastic modulus of 1870 cm³ and UC 254×254×132 has 1870 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 300 B at 117 kg/m, against 132 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UC 254×254×132 gives 1870 cm³ of plastic modulus and 22,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 1870 cm³ and 25,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 300 B, with a second moment of area of 25,200 cm⁴ against 22,500 cm⁴ (12.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×132 vs HE 260 CUC 254×254×132 vs W 10X88
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…