CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 254×254×132 vs HE 260 C

UC 254×254×132 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 260 C is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1870 cm³ against 1880 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 132 kg/m and 132 kg/m. Both are about 276 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 254×254×132
UC
HE 260 C
HE
Difference
Mass132 kg/m132 kg/msame
Depth276.3 mm275 mm+0.5%
Width261.3 mm264 mm-1.0%
Web thickness15.3 mm14 mm+9.3%
Flange thickness25.3 mm25 mm+1.2%
Area168 cm²168 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)22,500 cm⁴22,600 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,870 cm³1,880 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,630 cm³1,640 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,530 cm⁴7,680 cm⁴-2.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)878 cm³888 cm³-1.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.69 cm6.75 cm-0.9%
Torsion constant (It)319 cm⁴340 cm⁴-6.2%

UC 254×254×132 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 260 C to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 260 C.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 260 C has the larger second moment of area: 22,600 cm⁴ against 22,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.2 against 14.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 254×254×132 has a plastic modulus of 1870 cm³ and HE 260 C has 1880 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 254×254×132 is 132 kg/m and HE 260 C is 132 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 260 C gives 1880 cm³ of plastic modulus and 22,600 cm⁴ of inertia against 1870 cm³ and 22,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 260 C, with a second moment of area of 22,600 cm⁴ against 22,500 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×132 vs W 10X88W 10X88 vs HE 260 CHE 300 B vs UC 254×254×132
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…