CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 400 vs H-400x200x8x13-65.4

IPE 400 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; H-400x200x8x13-65.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1310 cm³ against 1313 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 66.3 kg/m and 65.4 kg/m. Both are about 400 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 400
IPE
H-400x200x8x13-65.4
MB & MC
Difference
Mass66.3 kg/m65.4 kg/m+1.4%
Depth400 mm400 mmsame
Width180 mm200 mm-10.0%
Web thickness8.6 mm8 mm+7.5%
Flange thickness13.5 mm13 mm+3.8%
Area84.5 cm²83.4 cm²+1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)23,100 cm⁴23,460 cm⁴-1.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,310 cm³1,313 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,160 cm³1,173 cm³-1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,320 cm⁴1,736 cm⁴-24.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)229 cm³267 cm³-14.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.95 cm4.56 cm-13.4%
Torsion constant (It)51.3 cm⁴39.6 cm⁴+29.5%

IPE 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-400x200x8x13-65.4 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x200x8x13-65.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x200x8x13-65.4 has the larger second moment of area: 23,460 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴, a difference of 1.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (19.8 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x200x8x13-65.4 has 267 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 229 cm³, 14.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. IPE 400 has a plastic modulus of 1310 cm³ and H-400x200x8x13-65.4 has 1313 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: IPE 400 is 66.3 kg/m and H-400x200x8x13-65.4 is 65.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x200x8x13-65.4 gives 1313 cm³ of plastic modulus and 23,460 cm⁴ of inertia against 1310 cm³ and 23,100 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

H-400x200x8x13-65.4, with a second moment of area of 23,460 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴ (1.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 400 vs UB 406×178×67IPE 400 vs W 16X45
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…