CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 400 vs UB 406×178×67

IPE 400 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; UB 406×178×67 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). UB 406×178×67 carries more bending: 1350 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1310 cm³, 3.0% more. They weigh essentially the same, 66.3 kg/m and 67.1 kg/m. UB 406×178×67 is deeper, 409.4 mm against 400 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 400
IPE
UB 406×178×67
UB
Difference
Mass66.3 kg/m67.1 kg/m-1.2%
Depth400 mm409.4 mm-2.3%
Width180 mm178.8 mm+0.7%
Web thickness8.6 mm8.8 mm-2.3%
Flange thickness13.5 mm14.3 mm-5.6%
Area84.5 cm²85.5 cm²-1.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)23,100 cm⁴24,300 cm⁴-4.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,310 cm³1,350 cm³-3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,160 cm³1,190 cm³-2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,320 cm⁴1,360 cm⁴-2.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)229 cm³237 cm³-3.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.95 cm3.99 cm-1.0%
Torsion constant (It)51.3 cm⁴46.1 cm⁴+11.3%

IPE 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UB 406×178×67 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 406×178×67.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 406×178×67 has the larger second moment of area: 24,300 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴, a difference of 4.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (19.8 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, UB 406×178×67 is the stronger section and IPE 400 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 406×178×67 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1350 cm³ against 1310 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: IPE 400 is 66.3 kg/m and UB 406×178×67 is 67.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 406×178×67 gives 1350 cm³ of plastic modulus and 24,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 1310 cm³ and 23,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 406×178×67, with a second moment of area of 24,300 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴ (4.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 400 vs W 16X45IPE 400 vs H-400x200x8x13-65.4UB 406×178×67 vs W 16X45UB 406×178×67 vs H-400x200x8x13-66
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…