CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 406×178×67 vs H-400x200x8x13-66

UB 406×178×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-400x200x8x13-66 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1350 cm³ against 1326 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 67.1 kg/m and 66 kg/m. UB 406×178×67 is deeper, 409.4 mm against 400 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 406×178×67
UB
H-400x200x8x13-66
MB & MC
Difference
Mass67.1 kg/m66 kg/m+1.7%
Depth409.4 mm400 mm+2.3%
Width178.8 mm200 mm-10.6%
Web thickness8.8 mm8 mm+10.0%
Flange thickness14.3 mm13 mm+10.0%
Area85.5 cm²84.1 cm²+1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)24,300 cm⁴23,710 cm⁴+2.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,350 cm³1,326 cm³+1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,190 cm³1,185 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,360 cm⁴1,737 cm⁴-21.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)237 cm³268 cm³-11.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.99 cm4.54 cm-12.1%
Torsion constant (It)46.1 cm⁴42.2 cm⁴+9.2%

UB 406×178×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-400x200x8x13-66 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x200x8x13-66.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 406×178×67 has the larger second moment of area: 24,300 cm⁴ against 23,710 cm⁴, a difference of 2.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.1 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x200x8x13-66 has 268 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 237 cm³, 11.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 406×178×67 has a plastic modulus of 1350 cm³ and H-400x200x8x13-66 has 1326 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 406×178×67 is 67.1 kg/m and H-400x200x8x13-66 is 66 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x200x8x13-66 gives 1326 cm³ of plastic modulus and 23,710 cm⁴ of inertia against 1350 cm³ and 24,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 406×178×67, with a second moment of area of 24,300 cm⁴ against 23,710 cm⁴ (2.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 400 vs UB 406×178×67UB 406×178×67 vs W 16X45W 16X45 vs H-400x200x8x13-66
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…