CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 406×178×67 vs W 16X45

UB 406×178×67 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 16X45 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1350 cm³ against 1348.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 67.1 kg/m and 67 kg/m. Both are about 409 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 406×178×67
UB
W 16X45
W
Difference
Mass67.1 kg/m67 kg/m+0.1%
Depth409.4 mm408.9 mm+0.1%
Width178.8 mm178.8 mmsame
Web thickness8.8 mm8.8 mmsame
Flange thickness14.3 mm14.4 mm-0.7%
Area85.5 cm²85.8 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)24,300 cm⁴24,391 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,350 cm³1,348.7 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,190 cm³1,191.3 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,360 cm⁴1,365 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)237 cm³237.61 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.99 cm3.99 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)46.1 cm⁴46.2 cm⁴-0.2%

UB 406×178×67 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 16X45 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 16X45.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X45 has the larger second moment of area: 24,391 cm⁴ against 24,300 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.1 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 406×178×67 has a plastic modulus of 1350 cm³ and W 16X45 has 1348.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 406×178×67 is 67.1 kg/m and W 16X45 is 67 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 16X45 gives 1348.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 24,391 cm⁴ of inertia against 1350 cm³ and 24,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X45, with a second moment of area of 24,391 cm⁴ against 24,300 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 400 vs UB 406×178×67IPE 400 vs W 16X45UB 406×178×67 vs H-400x200x8x13-66W 16X45 vs H-400x200x8x13-66
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…