CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 400 vs W 16X45

IPE 400 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; W 16X45 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 16X45 carries more bending: 1348.7 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1310 cm³, 2.9% more. They weigh essentially the same, 66.3 kg/m and 67 kg/m. W 16X45 is deeper, 408.9 mm against 400 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 400
IPE
W 16X45
W
Difference
Mass66.3 kg/m67 kg/m-1.0%
Depth400 mm408.9 mm-2.2%
Width180 mm178.8 mm+0.7%
Web thickness8.6 mm8.8 mm-2.3%
Flange thickness13.5 mm14.4 mm-6.3%
Area84.5 cm²85.8 cm²-1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)23,100 cm⁴24,391 cm⁴-5.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,310 cm³1,348.7 cm³-2.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,160 cm³1,191.3 cm³-2.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,320 cm⁴1,365 cm⁴-3.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)229 cm³237.61 cm³-3.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.95 cm3.99 cm-1.0%
Torsion constant (It)51.3 cm⁴46.2 cm⁴+11.0%

IPE 400 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; W 16X45 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 16X45.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X45 has the larger second moment of area: 24,391 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴, a difference of 5.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (19.8 against 20.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 16X45 is the stronger section and IPE 400 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 16X45 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1348.7 cm³ against 1310 cm³ - 2.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: IPE 400 is 66.3 kg/m and W 16X45 is 67 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 16X45 gives 1348.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 24,391 cm⁴ of inertia against 1310 cm³ and 23,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X45, with a second moment of area of 24,391 cm⁴ against 23,100 cm⁴ (5.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 400 vs UB 406×178×67IPE 400 vs H-400x200x8x13-65.4UB 406×178×67 vs W 16X45W 16X45 vs H-400x200x8x13-66
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…