CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 600 vs S 24X90

IPE 600 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; S 24X90 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. S 24X90 carries more bending: 3637.9 cm³ of plastic modulus against 3510 cm³, 3.5% more. IPE 600 is the lighter of the two at 122 kg/m against 133.9 kg/m, a saving of 8.9% on steel weight. Both are about 605 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 600
IPE
S 24X90
S
Difference
Mass122 kg/m133.9 kg/m-8.9%
Depth600 mm609.6 mm-1.6%
Width220 mm181.1 mm+21.5%
Web thickness12 mm15.9 mm-24.5%
Flange thickness19 mm22.1 mm-14.0%
Area156 cm²171 cm²-8.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)92,100 cm⁴93,652 cm⁴-1.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,510 cm³3,637.9 cm³-3.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,070 cm³3,064.4 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,390 cm⁴1,861 cm⁴+82.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)486 cm³367.07 cm³+32.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.66 cm3.3 cm+41.2%
Torsion constant (It)165 cm⁴251.8 cm⁴-34.5%

IPE 600 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; S 24X90 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 24X90.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, S 24X90 has the larger second moment of area: 93,652 cm⁴ against 92,100 cm⁴, a difference of 1.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE 600 is the more efficient section: 28.8 against 27.2 cm³ per kg/m, 5.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: IPE 600 has 486 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 367.07 cm³, 32.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.9% weight.

In short, S 24X90 is the stronger section and IPE 600 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

S 24X90 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 3637.9 cm³ against 3510 cm³ - 3.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE 600 at 122 kg/m, against 133.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 24X90 gives 3637.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 93,652 cm⁴ of inertia against 3510 cm³ and 92,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

S 24X90, with a second moment of area of 93,652 cm⁴ against 92,100 cm⁴ (1.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 600 vs UB 610×229×125IPE 600 vs W 24X84IPE 600 vs H-600x200x12x20-120UB 610×229×125 vs S 24X90W 24X84 vs S 24X90
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…