CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 600 vs UB 610×229×125

IPE 600 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; UB 610×229×125 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). UB 610×229×125 carries more bending: 3680 cm³ of plastic modulus against 3510 cm³, 4.6% more. IPE 600 is the lighter of the two at 122 kg/m against 125.1 kg/m, a saving of 2.5% on steel weight. Both are about 606 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 600
IPE
UB 610×229×125
UB
Difference
Mass122 kg/m125.1 kg/m-2.5%
Depth600 mm612.2 mm-2.0%
Width220 mm229 mm-3.9%
Web thickness12 mm11.9 mm+0.8%
Flange thickness19 mm19.6 mm-3.1%
Area156 cm²159 cm²-1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)92,100 cm⁴98,600 cm⁴-6.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,510 cm³3,680 cm³-4.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,070 cm³3,220 cm³-4.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,390 cm⁴3,930 cm⁴-13.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)486 cm³535 cm³-9.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.66 cm4.97 cm-6.2%
Torsion constant (It)165 cm⁴154 cm⁴+7.1%

IPE 600 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UB 610×229×125 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 610×229×125.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 610×229×125 has the larger second moment of area: 98,600 cm⁴ against 92,100 cm⁴, a difference of 6.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 610×229×125 is the more efficient section: 29.4 against 28.8 cm³ per kg/m, 2.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 610×229×125 has 535 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 486 cm³, 9.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.5% weight.

In short, UB 610×229×125 is the stronger section and IPE 600 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 610×229×125 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 3680 cm³ against 3510 cm³ - 4.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE 600 at 122 kg/m, against 125.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 610×229×125 gives 3680 cm³ of plastic modulus and 98,600 cm⁴ of inertia against 3510 cm³ and 92,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 610×229×125, with a second moment of area of 98,600 cm⁴ against 92,100 cm⁴ (6.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 600 vs W 24X84IPE 600 vs S 24X90IPE 600 vs H-600x200x12x20-120UB 610×229×125 vs HE 600 AAUB 610×229×125 vs W 24X84UB 610×229×125 vs S 24X90UB 610×229×125 vs H-600x200x13x23
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…