CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×229×125 vs W 24X84

UB 610×229×125 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X84 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3680 cm³ against 3670.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 125.1 kg/m and 125 kg/m. Both are about 612 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×229×125
UB
W 24X84
W
Difference
Mass125.1 kg/m125 kg/m+0.1%
Depth612.2 mm612.1 mmsame
Width229 mm229.1 mmsame
Web thickness11.9 mm11.9 mmsame
Flange thickness19.6 mm19.6 mmsame
Area159 cm²159.4 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)98,600 cm⁴98,647 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,680 cm³3,670.7 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,220 cm³3,211.9 cm³+0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,930 cm⁴3,929 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)535 cm³534.22 cm³+0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.97 cm4.95 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)154 cm⁴154 cm⁴same

UB 610×229×125 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X84 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X84.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X84 has the larger second moment of area: 98,647 cm⁴ against 98,600 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (29.4 against 29.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×229×125 has a plastic modulus of 3680 cm³ and W 24X84 has 3670.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×229×125 is 125.1 kg/m and W 24X84 is 125 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X84 gives 3670.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 98,647 cm⁴ of inertia against 3680 cm³ and 98,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X84, with a second moment of area of 98,647 cm⁴ against 98,600 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 600 vs UB 610×229×125IPE 600 vs W 24X84UB 610×229×125 vs HE 600 AAUB 610×229×125 vs S 24X90UB 610×229×125 vs H-600x200x13x23W 24X84 vs HE 600 AAW 24X84 vs S 24X90W 24X84 vs H-600x200x13x23
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…