CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 200×75×23 vs C 8X18.75

PFC 200×75×23 is an PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); C 8X18.75 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 227 cm³ against 227.78 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. PFC 200×75×23 is the lighter of the two at 23.4 kg/m against 27.9 kg/m, a saving of 16.1% on steel weight. Both are about 202 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 200×75×23
PFC
C 8X18.75
C
Difference
Mass23.4 kg/m27.9 kg/m-16.1%
Depth200 mm203.2 mm-1.6%
Width75 mm64.3 mm+16.6%
Web thickness6 mm12.4 mm-51.6%
Flange thickness12.5 mm9.9 mm+26.3%
Area29.9 cm²35.5 cm²-15.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,960 cm⁴1,827 cm⁴+7.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)227 cm³227.78 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)196 cm³180.26 cm³+8.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)170 cm⁴82 cm⁴+107.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)60.6 cm³35.56 cm³+70.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.39 cm1.52 cm+57.2%
Torsion constant (It)11.1 cm⁴18.06 cm⁴-38.5%

PFC 200×75×23 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; C 8X18.75 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to C 8X18.75.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 200×75×23 has the larger second moment of area: 1,960 cm⁴ against 1,827 cm⁴, a difference of 7.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, PFC 200×75×23 is the more efficient section: 9.7 against 8.2 cm³ per kg/m, 18.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 200×75×23 has 60.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 35.56 cm³, 70.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and C to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 16.1% weight.

In short, C 8X18.75 is the stronger section and PFC 200×75×23 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 200×75×23 has a plastic modulus of 227 cm³ and C 8X18.75 has 227.78 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

PFC 200×75×23 at 23.4 kg/m, against 27.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 16.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: C 8X18.75 gives 227.78 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,827 cm⁴ of inertia against 227 cm³ and 1,960 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 200×75×23, with a second moment of area of 1,960 cm⁴ against 1,827 cm⁴ (7.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 200×75×23 vs PFC 200×75C 8X18.75 vs PFC 200×75
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…