CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 300×100×46 vs MC 12X31

PFC 300×100×46 is an PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); MC 12X31 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 641 cm³ against 650.57 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 45.5 kg/m and 46.1 kg/m. Both are about 302 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 300×100×46
PFC
MC 12X31
MC
Difference
Mass45.5 kg/m46.1 kg/m-1.3%
Depth300 mm304.8 mm-1.6%
Width100 mm93.2 mm+7.3%
Web thickness9 mm9.4 mm-4.3%
Flange thickness16.5 mm17.8 mm-7.3%
Area58 cm²58.8 cm²-1.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,230 cm⁴8,408 cm⁴-2.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)641 cm³650.57 cm³-1.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)549 cm³552.24 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)568 cm⁴470.3 cm⁴+20.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)148 cm³133.55 cm³+10.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.13 cm2.82 cm+11.0%
Torsion constant (It)36.8 cm⁴41.62 cm⁴-11.6%

PFC 300×100×46 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; MC 12X31 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to MC 12X31.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, MC 12X31 has the larger second moment of area: 8,408 cm⁴ against 8,230 cm⁴, a difference of 2.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.1 against 14.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 300×100×46 has 148 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 133.55 cm³, 10.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and MC to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 300×100×46 has a plastic modulus of 641 cm³ and MC 12X31 has 650.57 cm³, a difference of only 1.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 300×100×46 is 45.5 kg/m and MC 12X31 is 46.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: MC 12X31 gives 650.57 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,408 cm⁴ of inertia against 641 cm³ and 8,230 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

MC 12X31, with a second moment of area of 8,408 cm⁴ against 8,230 cm⁴ (2.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 300×100×46 vs PFC 300×100
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…