CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 300×100×46 vs PFC 300×100

PFC 300×100×46 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 300×100 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 641 cm³ against 641 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 45.5 kg/m and 45.5 kg/m. Both are about 300 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 300×100×46
PFC
PFC 300×100
PFC
Difference
Mass45.5 kg/m45.5 kg/msame
Depth300 mm300 mmsame
Width100 mm100 mmsame
Web thickness9 mm9 mmsame
Flange thickness16.5 mm16.5 mmsame
Area58 cm²58 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)8,230 cm⁴8,229 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)641 cm³641 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)549 cm³549 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)568 cm⁴568 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)148 cm³148 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.13 cm3.13 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)36.8 cm⁴36.8 cm⁴same

PFC 300×100×46 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 300×100 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 300×100.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 300×100×46 has the larger second moment of area: 8,230 cm⁴ against 8,229 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.1 against 14.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 300×100×46 has a plastic modulus of 641 cm³ and PFC 300×100 has 641 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 300×100×46 is 45.5 kg/m and PFC 300×100 is 45.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 300×100 gives 641 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,229 cm⁴ of inertia against 641 cm³ and 8,230 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 300×100×46, with a second moment of area of 8,230 cm⁴ against 8,229 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 300×100×46 vs MC 12X31
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…