CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 203×133×25 vs IPE O 200

UB 203×133×25 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE O 200 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UB 203×133×25 carries more bending: 258 cm³ of plastic modulus against 249 cm³, 3.6% more. They weigh essentially the same, 25.1 kg/m and 25.1 kg/m. Both are about 203 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 203×133×25
UB
IPE O 200
IPE
Difference
Mass25.1 kg/m25.1 kg/msame
Depth203.2 mm202 mm+0.6%
Width133.2 mm102 mm+30.6%
Web thickness5.7 mm6.2 mm-8.1%
Flange thickness7.8 mm9.5 mm-17.9%
Area32 cm²32 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)2,340 cm⁴2,210 cm⁴+5.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)258 cm³249 cm³+3.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)230 cm³219 cm³+5.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)308 cm⁴169 cm⁴+82.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)70.9 cm³51.9 cm³+36.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.1 cm2.3 cm+34.8%
Torsion constant (It)5.96 cm⁴9.36 cm⁴-36.3%

UB 203×133×25 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE O 200 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE O 200.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 203×133×25 has the larger second moment of area: 2,340 cm⁴ against 2,210 cm⁴, a difference of 5.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 203×133×25 is the more efficient section: 10.3 against 9.9 cm³ per kg/m, 3.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 203×133×25 has 70.9 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 51.9 cm³, 36.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, UB 203×133×25 is the stronger section and IPE O 200 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 203×133×25 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 258 cm³ against 249 cm³ - 3.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 203×133×25 is 25.1 kg/m and IPE O 200 is 25.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE O 200 gives 249 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,210 cm⁴ of inertia against 258 cm³ and 2,340 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 203×133×25, with a second moment of area of 2,340 cm⁴ against 2,210 cm⁴ (5.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 203×133×25 vs S 8X18.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…