CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×102×33 vs W 12X22

UB 305×102×33 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X22 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 481 cm³ against 480.14 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 32.8 kg/m and 32.7 kg/m. Both are about 313 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×102×33
UB
W 12X22
W
Difference
Mass32.8 kg/m32.7 kg/m+0.3%
Depth312.7 mm312.4 mm+0.1%
Width102.4 mm102.4 mmsame
Web thickness6.6 mm6.6 mmsame
Flange thickness10.8 mm10.8 mmsame
Area41.8 cm²41.8 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)6,500 cm⁴6,493 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)481 cm³480.14 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)416 cm³416.23 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)194 cm⁴194 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)60 cm³59.977 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.15 cm2.15 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)12.2 cm⁴12.2 cm⁴same

UB 305×102×33 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X22 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X22.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 305×102×33 has the larger second moment of area: 6,500 cm⁴ against 6,493 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.7 against 14.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×102×33 has a plastic modulus of 481 cm³ and W 12X22 has 480.14 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 305×102×33 is 32.8 kg/m and W 12X22 is 32.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X22 gives 480.14 cm³ of plastic modulus and 6,493 cm⁴ of inertia against 481 cm³ and 6,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 305×102×33, with a second moment of area of 6,500 cm⁴ against 6,493 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×102×33 vs H-300x150x5.5x8W 12X22 vs H-300x150x5.5x8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…