CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×54 vs S 12X40.8

UB 305×165×54 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 12X40.8 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. S 12X40.8 carries more bending: 863.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 846 cm³, 2.0% more. UB 305×165×54 is the lighter of the two at 54 kg/m against 60.7 kg/m, a saving of 11.0% on steel weight. Both are about 308 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×54
UB
S 12X40.8
S
Difference
Mass54 kg/m60.7 kg/m-11.0%
Depth310.4 mm304.8 mm+1.8%
Width166.9 mm133.4 mm+25.1%
Web thickness7.9 mm11.7 mm-32.5%
Flange thickness13.7 mm16.7 mm-18.0%
Area68.8 cm²76.8 cm²-10.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)11,700 cm⁴11,238 cm⁴+4.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)846 cm³863.6 cm³-2.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)754 cm³739.06 cm³+2.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,060 cm⁴561.9 cm⁴+88.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)196 cm³145.19 cm³+35.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.93 cm2.69 cm+46.1%
Torsion constant (It)34.8 cm⁴70.34 cm⁴-50.5%

UB 305×165×54 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 12X40.8 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 12X40.8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 305×165×54 has the larger second moment of area: 11,700 cm⁴ against 11,238 cm⁴, a difference of 4.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 305×165×54 is the more efficient section: 15.7 against 14.2 cm³ per kg/m, 10.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 305×165×54 has 196 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 145.19 cm³, 35.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.0% weight.

In short, S 12X40.8 is the stronger section and UB 305×165×54 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

S 12X40.8 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 863.6 cm³ against 846 cm³ - 2.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 305×165×54 at 54 kg/m, against 60.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 12X40.8 gives 863.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11,238 cm⁴ of inertia against 846 cm³ and 11,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 305×165×54, with a second moment of area of 11,700 cm⁴ against 11,238 cm⁴ (4.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×54 vs W 12X35UB 305×165×54 vs H-300x200x8x12-55.8W 12X35 vs S 12X40.8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…