CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×54 vs W 12X35

UB 305×165×54 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X35 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 846 cm³ against 839.02 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. W 12X35 is the lighter of the two at 52.1 kg/m against 54 kg/m, a saving of 3.6% on steel weight. W 12X35 is deeper, 317.5 mm against 310.4 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×54
UB
W 12X35
W
Difference
Mass54 kg/m52.1 kg/m+3.6%
Depth310.4 mm317.5 mm-2.2%
Width166.9 mm166.6 mm+0.2%
Web thickness7.9 mm7.6 mm+3.9%
Flange thickness13.7 mm13.2 mm+3.8%
Area68.8 cm²66.5 cm²+3.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)11,700 cm⁴11,863 cm⁴-1.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)846 cm³839.02 cm³+0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)754 cm³747.25 cm³+0.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,060 cm⁴1,020 cm⁴+3.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)196 cm³188.45 cm³+4.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.93 cm3.91 cm+0.5%
Torsion constant (It)34.8 cm⁴30.84 cm⁴+12.8%

UB 305×165×54 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X35 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X35.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X35 has the larger second moment of area: 11,863 cm⁴ against 11,700 cm⁴, a difference of 1.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 12X35 is the more efficient section: 16.1 against 15.7 cm³ per kg/m, 2.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.6% weight.

In short, UB 305×165×54 is the stronger section and W 12X35 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 305×165×54 has a plastic modulus of 846 cm³ and W 12X35 has 839.02 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 12X35 at 52.1 kg/m, against 54 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X35 gives 839.02 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11,863 cm⁴ of inertia against 846 cm³ and 11,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X35, with a second moment of area of 11,863 cm⁴ against 11,700 cm⁴ (1.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 305×165×54 vs S 12X40.8UB 305×165×54 vs H-300x200x8x12-55.8W 12X35 vs S 12X40.8W 12X35 vs H-300x200x8x12-55.8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…