CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×161 vs W 18X106

UB 457×191×161 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X106 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3780 cm³ against 3769 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. W 18X106 is the lighter of the two at 157.7 kg/m against 161.4 kg/m, a saving of 2.3% on steel weight. UB 457×191×161 is deeper, 492 mm against 475 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×161
UB
W 18X106
W
Difference
Mass161.4 kg/m157.7 kg/m+2.3%
Depth492 mm475 mm+3.6%
Width199.4 mm284.5 mm-29.9%
Web thickness18 mm15 mm+20.0%
Flange thickness32 mm23.9 mm+33.9%
Area206 cm²200.6 cm²+2.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)79,800 cm⁴79,500 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,780 cm³3,769 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,240 cm³3,343 cm³-3.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,250 cm⁴9,157 cm⁴-53.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)672 cm³991.42 cm³-32.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.55 cm6.76 cm-32.7%
Torsion constant (It)515 cm⁴311.3 cm⁴+65.4%

UB 457×191×161 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X106.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×161 has the larger second moment of area: 79,800 cm⁴ against 79,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 18X106 is the more efficient section: 23.9 against 23.4 cm³ per kg/m, 2.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 18X106 has 991.42 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 672 cm³, 32.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.3% weight.

In short, UB 457×191×161 is the stronger section and W 18X106 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×161 has a plastic modulus of 3780 cm³ and W 18X106 has 3769 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 18X106 at 157.7 kg/m, against 161.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X106 gives 3769 cm³ of plastic modulus and 79,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 3780 cm³ and 79,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×161, with a second moment of area of 79,800 cm⁴ against 79,500 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×161 vs HE 500 AUB 457×191×161 vs H-500x300x13x21W 18X106 vs H-500x300x13x21
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…