CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 18X106 vs H-500x300x13x21

W 18X106 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-500x300x13x21 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3769 cm³ against 3792 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. H-500x300x13x21 is the lighter of the two at 150 kg/m against 157.7 kg/m, a saving of 5.1% on steel weight. H-500x300x13x21 is deeper, 494 mm against 475 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 18X106
W
H-500x300x13x21
MB & MC
Difference
Mass157.7 kg/m150 kg/m+5.1%
Depth475 mm494 mm-3.8%
Width284.5 mm302 mm-5.8%
Web thickness15 mm13 mm+15.4%
Flange thickness23.9 mm21 mm+13.8%
Area200.6 cm²191 cm²+5.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)79,500 cm⁴83,810 cm⁴-5.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,769 cm³3,792 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,343 cm³3,393 cm³-1.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,157 cm⁴9,663 cm⁴-5.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)991.42 cm³984 cm³+0.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.76 cm7.11 cm-4.9%
Torsion constant (It)311.3 cm⁴265 cm⁴+17.5%

W 18X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-500x300x13x21 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-500x300x13x21.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-500x300x13x21 has the larger second moment of area: 83,810 cm⁴ against 79,500 cm⁴, a difference of 5.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-500x300x13x21 is the more efficient section: 25.3 against 23.9 cm³ per kg/m, 5.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.1% weight.

In short, H-500x300x13x21 is the stronger section and H-500x300x13x21 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 18X106 has a plastic modulus of 3769 cm³ and H-500x300x13x21 has 3792 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-500x300x13x21 at 150 kg/m, against 157.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-500x300x13x21 gives 3792 cm³ of plastic modulus and 83,810 cm⁴ of inertia against 3769 cm³ and 79,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-500x300x13x21, with a second moment of area of 83,810 cm⁴ against 79,500 cm⁴ (5.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×161 vs W 18X106UB 457×191×161 vs H-500x300x13x21HE 500 A vs H-500x300x13x21
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…