CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 686×254×140 vs W 27X94

UB 686×254×140 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 27X94 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4560 cm³ against 4555.6 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 140.1 kg/m and 139.9 kg/m. Both are about 683 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 686×254×140
UB
W 27X94
W
Difference
Mass140.1 kg/m139.9 kg/m+0.1%
Depth683.5 mm683.3 mmsame
Width253.7 mm254 mm-0.1%
Web thickness12.4 mm12.4 mmsame
Flange thickness19 mm18.9 mm+0.5%
Area178 cm²178.1 cm²-0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)136,000 cm⁴136,108 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,560 cm³4,555.6 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,990 cm³3,982.1 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,180 cm⁴5,161 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)638 cm³635.82 cm³+0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.39 cm5.38 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)169 cm⁴167.7 cm⁴+0.8%

UB 686×254×140 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 27X94 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 27X94.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X94 has the larger second moment of area: 136,108 cm⁴ against 136,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (32.5 against 32.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 686×254×140 has a plastic modulus of 4560 cm³ and W 27X94 has 4555.6 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 686×254×140 is 140.1 kg/m and W 27X94 is 139.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 27X94 gives 4555.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 136,108 cm⁴ of inertia against 4560 cm³ and 136,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 27X94, with a second moment of area of 136,108 cm⁴ against 136,000 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×140 vs S 24X106W 27X94 vs S 24X106
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…