CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 686×254×140 vs S 24X106

UB 686×254×140 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 24X106 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4560 cm³ against 4572 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. UB 686×254×140 is the lighter of the two at 140.1 kg/m against 157.7 kg/m, a saving of 11.2% on steel weight. UB 686×254×140 is deeper, 683.5 mm against 622.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 686×254×140
UB
S 24X106
S
Difference
Mass140.1 kg/m157.7 kg/m-11.2%
Depth683.5 mm622.3 mm+9.8%
Width253.7 mm199.9 mm+26.9%
Web thickness12.4 mm15.7 mm-21.0%
Flange thickness19 mm27.7 mm-31.4%
Area178 cm²200.6 cm²-11.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)136,000 cm⁴122,372 cm⁴+11.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,560 cm³4,572 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,990 cm³3,932.9 cm³+1.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,180 cm⁴3,197 cm⁴+62.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)638 cm³547.33 cm³+16.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.39 cm3.99 cm+35.1%
Torsion constant (It)169 cm⁴420.4 cm⁴-59.8%

UB 686×254×140 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 24X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 24X106.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 686×254×140 has the larger second moment of area: 136,000 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴, a difference of 11.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 686×254×140 is the more efficient section: 32.5 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m, 12.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 686×254×140 has 638 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 547.33 cm³, 16.6% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.2% weight.

In short, S 24X106 is the stronger section and UB 686×254×140 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 686×254×140 has a plastic modulus of 4560 cm³ and S 24X106 has 4572 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 686×254×140 at 140.1 kg/m, against 157.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 24X106 gives 4572 cm³ of plastic modulus and 122,372 cm⁴ of inertia against 4560 cm³ and 136,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 686×254×140, with a second moment of area of 136,000 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴ (11.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×140 vs W 27X94UB 610×305×149 vs S 24X106W 27X94 vs S 24X106W 24X104 vs S 24X106W 24X103 vs S 24X106
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…