CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 24X104 vs S 24X106

W 24X104 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; S 24X106 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 24X104 carries more bending: 4735.9 cm³ of plastic modulus against 4572 cm³, 3.6% more. They weigh essentially the same, 154.8 kg/m and 157.7 kg/m. Both are about 617 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 24X104
W
S 24X106
S
Difference
Mass154.8 kg/m157.7 kg/m-1.8%
Depth612.1 mm622.3 mm-1.6%
Width325.1 mm199.9 mm+62.6%
Web thickness12.7 mm15.7 mm-19.1%
Flange thickness19 mm27.7 mm-31.4%
Area198.1 cm²200.6 cm²-1.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)129,032 cm⁴122,372 cm⁴+5.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,735.9 cm³4,572 cm³+3.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,227.9 cm³3,932.9 cm³+7.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,780 cm⁴3,197 cm⁴+237.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,022.6 cm³547.33 cm³+86.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.39 cm3.99 cm+85.2%
Torsion constant (It)196.5 cm⁴420.4 cm⁴-53.3%

W 24X104 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; S 24X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 24X106.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X104 has the larger second moment of area: 129,032 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴, a difference of 5.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 24X104 is the more efficient section: 30.6 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m, 5.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 24X104 has 1022.6 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 547.33 cm³, 86.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, W 24X104 is the stronger section and W 24X104 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 24X104 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 4735.9 cm³ against 4572 cm³ - 3.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 24X104 is 154.8 kg/m and S 24X106 is 157.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 24X106 gives 4572 cm³ of plastic modulus and 122,372 cm⁴ of inertia against 4735.9 cm³ and 129,032 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 24X104, with a second moment of area of 129,032 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴ (5.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×140 vs S 24X106UB 610×305×149 vs S 24X106W 27X94 vs S 24X106W 24X104 vs IPE O 600W 24X104 vs UB 610×305×149W 24X103 vs S 24X106
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…