CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 27X94 vs S 24X106

W 27X94 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; S 24X106 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4555.6 cm³ against 4572 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. W 27X94 is the lighter of the two at 139.9 kg/m against 157.7 kg/m, a saving of 11.3% on steel weight. W 27X94 is deeper, 683.3 mm against 622.3 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 27X94
W
S 24X106
S
Difference
Mass139.9 kg/m157.7 kg/m-11.3%
Depth683.3 mm622.3 mm+9.8%
Width254 mm199.9 mm+27.1%
Web thickness12.4 mm15.7 mm-21.0%
Flange thickness18.9 mm27.7 mm-31.8%
Area178.1 cm²200.6 cm²-11.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)136,108 cm⁴122,372 cm⁴+11.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,555.6 cm³4,572 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,982.1 cm³3,932.9 cm³+1.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,161 cm⁴3,197 cm⁴+61.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)635.82 cm³547.33 cm³+16.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.38 cm3.99 cm+34.8%
Torsion constant (It)167.7 cm⁴420.4 cm⁴-60.1%

W 27X94 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; S 24X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 24X106.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X94 has the larger second moment of area: 136,108 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴, a difference of 11.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 27X94 is the more efficient section: 32.6 against 29.0 cm³ per kg/m, 12.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 27X94 has 635.82 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 547.33 cm³, 16.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, S 24X106 is the stronger section and W 27X94 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 27X94 has a plastic modulus of 4555.6 cm³ and S 24X106 has 4572 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 27X94 at 139.9 kg/m, against 157.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 24X106 gives 4572 cm³ of plastic modulus and 122,372 cm⁴ of inertia against 4555.6 cm³ and 136,108 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 27X94, with a second moment of area of 136,108 cm⁴ against 122,372 cm⁴ (11.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×140 vs W 27X94UB 686×254×140 vs S 24X106UB 610×305×149 vs S 24X106W 24X104 vs S 24X106W 24X103 vs S 24X106
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…