CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×100 vs W 8X67

UC 203×203×100 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 8X67 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1150 cm³ against 1148.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 99.6 kg/m and 99.7 kg/m. Both are about 229 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×100
UC
W 8X67
W
Difference
Mass99.6 kg/m99.7 kg/m-0.1%
Depth228.6 mm228.6 mmsame
Width210.3 mm210.3 mmsame
Web thickness14.5 mm14.5 mmsame
Flange thickness23.7 mm23.7 mmsame
Area127 cm²127.1 cm²-0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)11,300 cm⁴11,321 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,150 cm³1,148.7 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)988 cm³989.78 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,680 cm⁴3,688 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)534 cm³535.86 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.39 cm5.38 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)210 cm⁴210.2 cm⁴-0.1%

UC 203×203×100 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 8X67 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 8X67.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X67 has the larger second moment of area: 11,321 cm⁴ against 11,300 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.5 against 11.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 203×203×100 has a plastic modulus of 1150 cm³ and W 8X67 has 1148.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 203×203×100 is 99.6 kg/m and W 8X67 is 99.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 8X67 gives 1148.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11,321 cm⁴ of inertia against 1150 cm³ and 11,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X67, with a second moment of area of 11,321 cm⁴ against 11,300 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×100 vs HE 200 MW 8X67 vs HE 200 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…