CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×71 vs W 8X48

UC 203×203×71 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 8X48 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 799 cm³ against 802.97 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 71 kg/m and 71.4 kg/m. Both are about 216 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×71
UC
W 8X48
W
Difference
Mass71 kg/m71.4 kg/m-0.6%
Depth215.8 mm215.9 mmsame
Width206.4 mm206 mm+0.2%
Web thickness10 mm10.2 mm-2.0%
Flange thickness17.3 mm17.4 mm-0.6%
Area90.4 cm²91 cm²-0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)7,620 cm⁴7,659 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)799 cm³802.97 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)706 cm³707.92 cm³-0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,540 cm⁴2,535 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)374 cm³375.26 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.3 cm5.28 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)80.2 cm⁴81.58 cm⁴-1.7%

UC 203×203×71 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 8X48 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 8X48.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X48 has the larger second moment of area: 7,659 cm⁴ against 7,620 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.3 against 11.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 203×203×71 has a plastic modulus of 799 cm³ and W 8X48 has 802.97 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 203×203×71 is 71 kg/m and W 8X48 is 71.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 8X48 gives 802.97 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,659 cm⁴ of inertia against 799 cm³ and 7,620 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X48, with a second moment of area of 7,659 cm⁴ against 7,620 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×71 vs HE 220 BW 8X48 vs HE 220 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…