CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×71 vs HE 220 B

UC 203×203×71 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 220 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 220 B carries more bending: 827 cm³ of plastic modulus against 799 cm³, 3.4% more. They weigh essentially the same, 71 kg/m and 71.5 kg/m. Both are about 218 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×71
UC
HE 220 B
HE
Difference
Mass71 kg/m71.5 kg/m-0.7%
Depth215.8 mm220 mm-1.9%
Width206.4 mm220 mm-6.2%
Web thickness10 mm9.5 mm+5.3%
Flange thickness17.3 mm16 mm+8.1%
Area90.4 cm²91 cm²-0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)7,620 cm⁴8,090 cm⁴-5.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)799 cm³827 cm³-3.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)706 cm³736 cm³-4.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,540 cm⁴2,840 cm⁴-10.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)374 cm³394 cm³-5.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.3 cm5.59 cm-5.2%
Torsion constant (It)80.2 cm⁴77 cm⁴+4.2%

UC 203×203×71 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 220 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 220 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 220 B has the larger second moment of area: 8,090 cm⁴ against 7,620 cm⁴, a difference of 5.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 220 B is the more efficient section: 11.6 against 11.3 cm³ per kg/m, 2.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, HE 220 B is the stronger section and UC 203×203×71 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 220 B is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 827 cm³ against 799 cm³ - 3.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UC 203×203×71 is 71 kg/m and HE 220 B is 71.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 220 B gives 827 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,090 cm⁴ of inertia against 799 cm³ and 7,620 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 220 B, with a second moment of area of 8,090 cm⁴ against 7,620 cm⁴ (5.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×71 vs W 8X48W 8X48 vs HE 220 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…