CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

RHS 75×50×3 - Section Properties

The RHS 75×50×3 is a steel section with a mass of 5.59 kg/m, an overall depth of 75 mm and width of 50 mm and a wall thickness of 3 mm. It has a cross-sectional area of 6.91 cm², a second moment of area Iᵧ of 52.2 cm⁴, a plastic modulus Wₚₗ,ᵧ of 17.1 cm³, tabulated by CivilAxis from EN 10219 · Continental Steel.

Mass
5.59 kg/m
Depth
75 mm
Width
50 mm
Wall thickness
3 mm
Area
6.91 cm²
Ask about capacity, buckling or detailing for RHS 75×50×3.
🔍 Open the full Steel Catalogue
or pick a unit on any row
RHS Cold-formed section profile showing the dimension symbols used for RHS 75×50×3

Dimension symbols for RHS Cold-formed sections. Not to scale.

RHS 75×50×3 section properties to EN 10219 · Continental Steel.

Geometry

Depth of sectionh75
Width of sectionb50
Wall thicknesst3

Mass and area

Mass per metremass5.59
Cross-sectional areaA6.91

Bending about the major axis (y-y)

Area moment of inertia about y-axisIy52.2
Elastic section modulus about y-axisWel,y13.9
Plastic section modulus about y-axisWpl,y17.1
Radius of gyration about y-axisiy2.75

Bending about the minor axis (z-z)

Area moment of inertia about z-axisIz27.8
Elastic section modulus about z-axisWel,z11.1
Plastic section modulus about z-axisWpl,z12.9
Radius of gyration about z-axisiz2

Torsion and warping

Torsion constant (St Venant)It59.3
Section modulus for torsionWt18.4

Surface area

Surface area per metreSA/m0.24

Is RHS 75×50×3 strong enough?

Simply supported beam, uniform load, major-axis bending - to EN 1993-1-1.

Passes - 58% utilised, deflection governs
Bending28%
1.7 / 6.1 kNm
Shear5%
4.5 / 85.0 kN
Deflection58%
2.4 / 4.2 mm

Class 1 section. ULS uses γQ = 1.5 on the load you enter; deflection uses the unfactored load against L/360. Lateral-torsional buckling is not included - the compression flange is assumed restrained.

Common questions about RHS 75×50×3

RHS 75×50×3 has a mass of 5.59 kg/m, tabulated to EN 10219. A 12 m length therefore weighs about 67 kg, which is the figure to use for a steel take-off or when checking a lift.

RHS 75×50×3 has a depth of 75 mm, a width of 50 mm, a wall thickness of 3 mm, with a cross-sectional area of 6.91 cm². These are the nominal dimensions from EN 10219; rolling tolerances apply to the delivered section.

The plastic section modulus about the major axis, Wpl,y, is 17.1 cm³, and the elastic modulus Wel,y is 13.9 cm³. Wpl,y is what sets the moment capacity of a Class 1 or 2 section: M_pl,Rd = Wpl,y x f_y / gamma_M0, so at S355 with gamma_M0 = 1.0 this section reaches about 6 kNm before any stability check.

The second moment of area about the major axis, Iy, is 52.2 cm⁴, and about the minor axis Iz is 27.8 cm⁴. Iy is the value deflection depends on - for a simply supported beam under a uniform load, the midspan deflection is 5wL⁴/384EIy - so on spans where a deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

iy is 2.75 cm about the major axis and iz is 2 cm about the minor axis. Column buckling is governed by the SMALLER value: the slenderness is lambda = L_cr / i, so with iz = 2 cm a 0.2 m effective length already gives lambda = 100. Minor-axis buckling almost always controls unless the weak axis is restrained.

The St Venant torsion constant It is 59.3 cm⁴. Closed sections carry torsion in a shear flow around the perimeter, which makes them far stiffer in torsion than an open section of the same weight and is usually why one is specified.

Related RHS Cold-formed sizes

RHS 75×38×4RHS 75×38×4.5RHS 75×50×1.9RHS 75×50×2.3RHS 75×50×3.2RHS 75×50×4RHS 75×50×4.5RHS 75×50×4.6

Learn more

📘 How to read a steel section table (UB, UC, IPE, HE)📘 Section modulus explained: elastic (Wel) vs plastic (Wpl)📘 SHS vs RHS vs CHS: choosing a hollow steel section
All RHS Cold-formed sizes
Rectangular Hollow Sections - Cold-formed
Full steel section tables
Every UB, UC, hollow, channel & angle section
Open the interactive tool
Search, compare & run EC3 capacity checks
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…