CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 - Design Values

Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 is a dimensional lumber grade with reference design values to NDS 2018 Supplement Table 4A. Its reference bending value Fb is 525 psi, compression parallel Fc is 775 psi, and modulus of elasticity E is 1,400,000 psi (NDS). Values are shown before adjustment factors; apply the relevant NDS C-factors or EC5 k_mod and γ_M for your load case.

Fb (bending)
525 psi
Fc (compression)
775 psi
E (modulus)
1.4M psi
Reference design values (NDS 2018)
FbBending525 psi
FtTension parallel325 psi
FvShear parallel180 psi
Fc⊥Compression perpendicular625 psi
FcCompression parallel775 psi
EModulus of elasticity1,400,000 psi
EminModulus for stability510,000 psi
GSpecific gravity0.5
Common supplied sizes
NominalActual (in)Metric (mm)
2x41.5 x 3.538 x 89
2x61.5 x 5.538 x 140
2x81.5 x 7.2538 x 184
2x101.5 x 9.2538 x 235
2x121.5 x 11.2538 x 286

Source: NDS 2018 Supplement Table 4A. Reference values are shown before adjustment factors (NDS C-factors / EC5 k_mod, γ_M) - apply these per your load case in design.

Understanding these values

For a beam in Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3, bending at Fb 525 psi normally sets the size, but the check that actually governs depends on the span. Short heavily loaded members are often limited by shear at Fv 180 psi, and bearing at a support is limited by compression perpendicular to grain at Fc perp 625 psi, which is the lowest of the strength values and the one most often overlooked. Used as a post or stud, the governing value is compression parallel at Fc 775 psi.

Stiffness for Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 is E 1,400,000 psi, with the reduced modulus Emin 510,000 psi used for stability calculations such as the beam stability factor CL and the column stability factor CP. On typical floor spans, deflection rather than strength decides the section, so compare E before Fb when the member is a joist. Its specific gravity of 0.5 is the value connection design works from, not the strength figures.

Within the dimensional lumber entries in this catalogue, Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 ranks 12 of 13 on bending at 525 psi; the strongest listed is Southern Pine, Select Structural at 2,550 psi. Grade choice is usually a trade of cost against section depth, so it is worth checking whether a lower grade in a deeper section is cheaper than a higher grade at the depth you started with.

The closest alternative in the same family is Spruce-Pine-Fir, No. 3 at 500 psi in bending, 5% below this grade. If availability drives the choice rather than capacity, that is the substitution to price first - but re-run the deflection check as well, because stiffness and strength do not always move together.

Common questions

Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 has a reference bending design value Fb of 525 psi to NDS 2018 Supplement Table 4A. This is the value before adjustment: multiply by the applicable C-factors (load duration CD, wet service CM, size CF, repetitive member Cr and beam stability CL) for your member and its environment.

E is 1,400,000 psi, and the reduced modulus Emin used in stability calculations is 510,000 psi. E is what you use for deflection; Emin feeds the beam stability factor CL and column stability factor CP. On typical floor joists deflection governs, so E is usually the number that decides the section.

Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 3 sits at 525 psi in bending, ranking 12 of 13 among the dimensional lumber grades listed here; the strongest is Southern Pine, Select Structural at 2,550 psi. Whether it is sufficient depends on your span and load, not on the grade alone - and because deflection often governs, a higher grade does not always give a smaller section. Check the deflection limit first, then bending.

Other Dimensional Lumber grades

Douglas Fir-Larch, Select StructuralDouglas Fir-Larch, No. 1Douglas Fir-Larch, No. 2Hem-Fir, Select StructuralHem-Fir, No. 1Hem-Fir, No. 2Spruce-Pine-Fir, Select StructuralSpruce-Pine-Fir, No. 1/No. 2Spruce-Pine-Fir, No. 3Southern Pine, Select Structural
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…