CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X324 vs UB 1016×305×487

W 40X324 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 1016×305×487 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). W 40X324 carries more bending: 23925.1 cm³ of plastic modulus against 23200 cm³, 3.1% more. They weigh essentially the same, 482.2 kg/m and 486.7 kg/m. Both are about 1029 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X324
W
UB 1016×305×487
UB
Difference
Mass482.2 kg/m486.7 kg/m-0.9%
Depth1021.1 mm1036.3 mm-1.5%
Width403.9 mm308.5 mm+30.9%
Web thickness25.4 mm30 mm-15.3%
Flange thickness46 mm54.1 mm-15.0%
Area614.8 cm²620 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,065,552 cm⁴1,022,000 cm⁴+4.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)23,925.1 cm³23,200 cm³+3.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)20,975.4 cm³19,700 cm³+6.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)50,780 cm⁴26,700 cm⁴+90.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,916.5 cm³2,800 cm³+39.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.09 cm6.57 cm+38.4%
Torsion constant (It)3,305 cm⁴4,300 cm⁴-23.1%

W 40X324 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 1016×305×487 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 1016×305×487.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X324 has the larger second moment of area: 1,065,552 cm⁴ against 1,022,000 cm⁴, a difference of 4.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 40X324 is the more efficient section: 49.6 against 47.7 cm³ per kg/m, 4.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 40X324 has 3916.5 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2800 cm³, 39.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 40X324 is the stronger section and W 40X324 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 40X324 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 23925.1 cm³ against 23200 cm³ - 3.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X324 is 482.2 kg/m and UB 1016×305×487 is 486.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 1016×305×487 gives 23200 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,022,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 23925.1 cm³ and 1,065,552 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X324, with a second moment of area of 1,065,552 cm⁴ against 1,022,000 cm⁴ (4.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×487 vs HE 1000 x 494UB 1016×305×487 vs W 40X327W 44X290 vs UB 1016×305×487W 40X324 vs HE 1000 x 494W 40X331 vs UB 1016×305×487W 36X330 vs UB 1016×305×487W 36X350 vs UB 1016×305×487
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…