CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×127×42 vs IPE 300

UB 305×127×42 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE 300 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. IPE 300 carries more bending: 628 cm³ of plastic modulus against 614 cm³, 2.2% more. They weigh essentially the same, 41.9 kg/m and 42.2 kg/m. UB 305×127×42 is deeper, 307.2 mm against 300 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×127×42
UB
IPE 300
IPE
Difference
Mass41.9 kg/m42.2 kg/m-0.7%
Depth307.2 mm300 mm+2.4%
Width124.3 mm150 mm-17.1%
Web thickness8 mm7.1 mm+12.7%
Flange thickness12.1 mm10.7 mm+13.1%
Area53.4 cm²53.8 cm²-0.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,200 cm⁴8,360 cm⁴-1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)614 cm³628 cm³-2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)534 cm³557 cm³-4.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)389 cm⁴604 cm⁴-35.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)98.4 cm³125 cm³-21.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.7 cm3.35 cm-19.4%
Torsion constant (It)21.1 cm⁴19.9 cm⁴+6.0%

UB 305×127×42 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE 300 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 300.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 300 has the larger second moment of area: 8,360 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.7 against 14.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: IPE 300 has 125 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 98.4 cm³, 21.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, IPE 300 is the stronger section and UB 305×127×42 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE 300 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 628 cm³ against 614 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UB 305×127×42 is 41.9 kg/m and IPE 300 is 42.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 300 gives 628 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,360 cm⁴ of inertia against 614 cm³ and 8,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 300, with a second moment of area of 8,360 cm⁴ against 8,200 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs UB 305×165×40IPE 300 vs W 12X26IPE 300 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×127×42 vs W 12X26UB 305×127×42 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…