CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 300 vs UB 305×165×40

IPE 300 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; UB 305×165×40 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 628 cm³ against 623 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. UB 305×165×40 is the lighter of the two at 40.3 kg/m against 42.2 kg/m, a saving of 4.7% on steel weight. Both are about 302 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 300
IPE
UB 305×165×40
UB
Difference
Mass42.2 kg/m40.3 kg/m+4.7%
Depth300 mm303.4 mm-1.1%
Width150 mm165 mm-9.1%
Web thickness7.1 mm6 mm+18.3%
Flange thickness10.7 mm10.2 mm+4.9%
Area53.8 cm²51.3 cm²+4.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,360 cm⁴8,500 cm⁴-1.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)628 cm³623 cm³+0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)557 cm³560 cm³-0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)604 cm⁴764 cm⁴-20.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)125 cm³142 cm³-12.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.35 cm3.86 cm-13.2%
Torsion constant (It)19.9 cm⁴14.7 cm⁴+35.4%

IPE 300 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; UB 305×165×40 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 305×165×40.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 305×165×40 has the larger second moment of area: 8,500 cm⁴ against 8,360 cm⁴, a difference of 1.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 305×165×40 is the more efficient section: 15.5 against 14.9 cm³ per kg/m, 3.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 305×165×40 has 142 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 125 cm³, 12.0% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.7% weight.

In short, IPE 300 is the stronger section and UB 305×165×40 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. IPE 300 has a plastic modulus of 628 cm³ and UB 305×165×40 has 623 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 305×165×40 at 40.3 kg/m, against 42.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 305×165×40 gives 623 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 628 cm³ and 8,360 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 305×165×40, with a second moment of area of 8,500 cm⁴ against 8,360 cm⁴ (1.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs W 12X26IPE 300 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×165×40 vs W 12X26UB 305×165×40 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×127×42 vs IPE 300
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…