CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 305×165×40 vs W 12X26

UB 305×165×40 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X26 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. UB 305×165×40 carries more bending: 623 cm³ of plastic modulus against 609.6 cm³, 2.2% more. W 12X26 is the lighter of the two at 38.7 kg/m against 40.3 kg/m, a saving of 4.1% on steel weight. W 12X26 is deeper, 309.9 mm against 303.4 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 305×165×40
UB
W 12X26
W
Difference
Mass40.3 kg/m38.7 kg/m+4.1%
Depth303.4 mm309.9 mm-2.1%
Width165 mm164.8 mm+0.1%
Web thickness6 mm5.8 mm+3.4%
Flange thickness10.2 mm9.7 mm+5.2%
Area51.3 cm²49.4 cm²+3.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,500 cm⁴8,491 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)623 cm³609.6 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)560 cm³547.33 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)764 cm⁴720.1 cm⁴+6.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)142 cm³133.88 cm³+6.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.86 cm3.84 cm+0.5%
Torsion constant (It)14.7 cm⁴12.49 cm⁴+17.7%

UB 305×165×40 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X26 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X26.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 305×165×40 has the larger second moment of area: 8,500 cm⁴ against 8,491 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (15.5 against 15.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.1% weight.

In short, UB 305×165×40 is the stronger section and W 12X26 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 305×165×40 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 623 cm³ against 609.6 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 12X26 at 38.7 kg/m, against 40.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X26 gives 609.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,491 cm⁴ of inertia against 623 cm³ and 8,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 305×165×40, with a second moment of area of 8,500 cm⁴ against 8,491 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 300 vs UB 305×165×40IPE 300 vs W 12X26UB 305×165×40 vs H-300x150x6.5x11UB 305×127×42 vs W 12X26W 12X26 vs H-300x150x6.5x11
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…